Gcore CDN vs IFTTT

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms362682
P95 · ms12211262
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key may be required for productionFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Gcore CDN vs IFTTT: common questions

Which is more reliable, Gcore CDN or IFTTT?

Both are neck-and-neck — Gcore CDN and IFTTT each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Gcore CDN or IFTTT?

Gcore CDN has the lower median latency in our checks — Gcore CDN responds in 362 ms versus IFTTT at 682 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Gcore CDN and IFTTT need an API key?

IFTTT needs no key, while Gcore CDN requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for IFTTT first.

Can I call Gcore CDN and IFTTT from the browser?

Only Gcore CDN is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. IFTTT needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Gcore CDN and IFTTT free for commercial use?

Gcore CDN has unclear commercial terms, and IFTTT has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.