Gawrshdarn vs TasteDive

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms
P95 · ms
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Gawrshdarn vs TasteDive: common questions

Which is more reliable, Gawrshdarn or TasteDive?

On our scheduled checks, TasteDive leads on measured uptime — Gawrshdarn at —% versus TasteDive at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Gawrshdarn and TasteDive need an API key?

Gawrshdarn needs no key, while TasteDive requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Gawrshdarn first.

Can I call Gawrshdarn and TasteDive from the browser?

Only Gawrshdarn is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. TasteDive needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Gawrshdarn and TasteDive free for commercial use?

Gawrshdarn has unclear commercial terms, and TasteDive has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.