Fruityvice vs SportScore

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%87.5%
Uptime · 30d100%90.0%
P50 · ms751288
P95 · ms39962112
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no API keyFree — no key (attribution tier)
Rate limitUnpublishedRetry-After: 5s
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Fruityvice vs SportScore: common questions

Which is more reliable, Fruityvice or SportScore?

On our scheduled checks, Fruityvice leads on measured uptime — Fruityvice at 100% versus SportScore at 87.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Fruityvice or SportScore?

SportScore has the lower median latency in our checks — Fruityvice responds in 751 ms versus SportScore at 288 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Fruityvice and SportScore need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Fruityvice is callable with no signup, and SportScore is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Fruityvice and SportScore from the browser?

Only SportScore is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Fruityvice needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Fruityvice and SportScore free for commercial use?

Fruityvice has unclear commercial terms, and SportScore has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.