Fruityvice vs openFDA API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms951806
P95 · ms39961868
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no API keyFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Fruityvice vs openFDA API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Fruityvice or openFDA API?

Both are neck-and-neck — Fruityvice and openFDA API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Fruityvice or openFDA API?

openFDA API has the lower median latency in our checks — Fruityvice responds in 951 ms versus openFDA API at 806 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Fruityvice and openFDA API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Fruityvice is callable with no signup, and openFDA API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Fruityvice and openFDA API from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Fruityvice and openFDA API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Fruityvice and openFDA API free for commercial use?

Fruityvice has unclear commercial terms, and openFDA API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.