Fruityvice vs NPPES

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms951910
P95 · ms39962071
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedU.S. Government (public NPI data)
Free tierFree — no API keyFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Fruityvice vs NPPES: common questions

Which is more reliable, Fruityvice or NPPES?

Both are neck-and-neck — Fruityvice and NPPES each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Fruityvice or NPPES?

NPPES has the lower median latency in our checks — Fruityvice responds in 951 ms versus NPPES at 910 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Fruityvice and NPPES need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Fruityvice is callable with no signup, and NPPES is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Fruityvice and NPPES from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Fruityvice and NPPES from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Fruityvice and NPPES free for commercial use?

Fruityvice has unclear commercial terms, and NPPES allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.