FreeGeoIP vs Zippopotam.us
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
FreeGeoIP vs Zippopotam.us: common questions
Which is more reliable, FreeGeoIP or Zippopotam.us?
On our scheduled checks, Zippopotam.us leads on measured uptime — FreeGeoIP at 96.1% versus Zippopotam.us at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, FreeGeoIP or Zippopotam.us?
Zippopotam.us has the lower median latency in our checks — FreeGeoIP responds in 242 ms versus Zippopotam.us at 219 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do FreeGeoIP and Zippopotam.us need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — FreeGeoIP is callable with no signup, and Zippopotam.us is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call FreeGeoIP and Zippopotam.us from the browser?
Yes — both FreeGeoIP and Zippopotam.us send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are FreeGeoIP and Zippopotam.us free for commercial use?
FreeGeoIP has unclear commercial terms, and Zippopotam.us has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.