FreeGeoIP vs PostalCodes
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
FreeGeoIP vs PostalCodes: common questions
Which is more reliable, FreeGeoIP or PostalCodes?
On our scheduled checks, PostalCodes leads on measured uptime — FreeGeoIP at 96.1% versus PostalCodes at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, FreeGeoIP or PostalCodes?
FreeGeoIP has the lower median latency in our checks — FreeGeoIP responds in 242 ms versus PostalCodes at 1030 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do FreeGeoIP and PostalCodes need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — FreeGeoIP is callable with no signup, and PostalCodes is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call FreeGeoIP and PostalCodes from the browser?
Only FreeGeoIP is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. PostalCodes needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are FreeGeoIP and PostalCodes free for commercial use?
FreeGeoIP has unclear commercial terms, and PostalCodes has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.