Footer Year Update vs Magic 8-Ball API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms131442
P95 · ms3291134
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Footer Year Update vs Magic 8-Ball API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Footer Year Update or Magic 8-Ball API?

Both are neck-and-neck — Footer Year Update and Magic 8-Ball API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Footer Year Update or Magic 8-Ball API?

Footer Year Update has the lower median latency in our checks — Footer Year Update responds in 131 ms versus Magic 8-Ball API at 442 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Footer Year Update and Magic 8-Ball API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Footer Year Update is callable with no signup, and Magic 8-Ball API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Footer Year Update and Magic 8-Ball API from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Footer Year Update and Magic 8-Ball API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Footer Year Update and Magic 8-Ball API free for commercial use?

Footer Year Update has unclear commercial terms, and Magic 8-Ball API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.