Footer Year Update vs Jobvetta

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms13285
P95 · ms329215
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-25
operationalpartialdownno data

Footer Year Update vs Jobvetta: common questions

Which is more reliable, Footer Year Update or Jobvetta?

Both are neck-and-neck — Footer Year Update and Jobvetta each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Footer Year Update or Jobvetta?

Jobvetta has the lower median latency in our checks — Footer Year Update responds in 132 ms versus Jobvetta at 85 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Footer Year Update and Jobvetta need an API key?

Footer Year Update needs no key, while Jobvetta requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Footer Year Update first.

Can I call Footer Year Update and Jobvetta from the browser?

Only Jobvetta is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Footer Year Update needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Footer Year Update and Jobvetta free for commercial use?

Footer Year Update has unclear commercial terms, and Jobvetta has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.