Foodish vs SportScore

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d27.5%87.3%
Uptime · 30d11.7%86.7%
P50 · ms250288
P95 · ms7602112
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (open-source)Unverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — no key (attribution tier)
Rate limitUnpublishedRetry-After: 5s
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Foodish vs SportScore: common questions

Which is more reliable, Foodish or SportScore?

On our scheduled checks, SportScore leads on measured uptime — Foodish at 27.5% versus SportScore at 87.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Foodish or SportScore?

Foodish has the lower median latency in our checks — Foodish responds in 250 ms versus SportScore at 288 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Foodish and SportScore need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Foodish is callable with no signup, and SportScore is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Foodish and SportScore from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Foodish and SportScore from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Foodish and SportScore free for commercial use?

Foodish has unclear commercial terms, and SportScore has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.