Fixer API vs Warnely

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%90.2%
Uptime · 30d98.3%83.3%
P50 · ms448334
P95 · ms8301375
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Fixer API vs Warnely: common questions

Which is more reliable, Fixer API or Warnely?

On our scheduled checks, Fixer API leads on measured uptime — Fixer API at 99.02% versus Warnely at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Fixer API or Warnely?

Warnely has the lower median latency in our checks — Fixer API responds in 448 ms versus Warnely at 334 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Fixer API and Warnely need an API key?

Warnely needs no key, while Fixer API requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Warnely first.

Can I call Fixer API and Warnely from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Fixer API and Warnely from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Fixer API and Warnely free for commercial use?

Fixer API has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.