Findwork vs Nager.Date

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms48156
P95 · ms1915553
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree, no key
Rate limit4294967295 req/window · 4294967295 remaining · resets 0Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Findwork vs Nager.Date: common questions

Which is more reliable, Findwork or Nager.Date?

Both are neck-and-neck — Findwork and Nager.Date each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Findwork or Nager.Date?

Nager.Date has the lower median latency in our checks — Findwork responds in 481 ms versus Nager.Date at 56 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Findwork and Nager.Date need an API key?

Nager.Date needs no key, while Findwork requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Nager.Date first.

Can I call Findwork and Nager.Date from the browser?

Only Nager.Date is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Findwork needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Findwork and Nager.Date free for commercial use?

Findwork has unclear commercial terms, and Nager.Date has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.