Findwork vs Himalayas
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Findwork vs Himalayas: common questions
Which is more reliable, Findwork or Himalayas?
On our scheduled checks, Findwork leads on measured uptime — Findwork at 100% versus Himalayas at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Findwork or Himalayas?
Himalayas has the lower median latency in our checks — Findwork responds in 481 ms versus Himalayas at 263 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Findwork and Himalayas need an API key?
Himalayas needs no key, while Findwork requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Himalayas first.
Can I call Findwork and Himalayas from the browser?
Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Findwork and Himalayas from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.
Are Findwork and Himalayas free for commercial use?
Findwork has unclear commercial terms, and Himalayas has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.