Findwork vs Grass Touch API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%2.9%
Uptime · 30d100%5.0%
P50 · ms4811701
P95 · ms19152338
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limit4294967295 req/window · 4294967295 remaining · resets 0Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Findwork vs Grass Touch API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Findwork or Grass Touch API?

On our scheduled checks, Findwork leads on measured uptime — Findwork at 100% versus Grass Touch API at 2.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Findwork or Grass Touch API?

Findwork has the lower median latency in our checks — Findwork responds in 481 ms versus Grass Touch API at 1701 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Findwork and Grass Touch API need an API key?

Grass Touch API needs no key, while Findwork requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Grass Touch API first.

Can I call Findwork and Grass Touch API from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Findwork and Grass Touch API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Findwork and Grass Touch API free for commercial use?

Findwork has unclear commercial terms, and Grass Touch API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.