FEC vs Represent by Open North

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%99.02%
Uptime · 30d98.3%98.3%
P50 · ms1602795
P95 · ms33342133
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (open; varies by source dataset)
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FEC vs Represent by Open North: common questions

Which is more reliable, FEC or Represent by Open North?

Both are neck-and-neck — FEC and Represent by Open North each measure 99.02% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, FEC or Represent by Open North?

Represent by Open North has the lower median latency in our checks — FEC responds in 1602 ms versus Represent by Open North at 795 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do FEC and Represent by Open North need an API key?

Represent by Open North needs no key, while FEC requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Represent by Open North first.

Can I call FEC and Represent by Open North from the browser?

Yes — both FEC and Represent by Open North send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are FEC and Represent by Open North free for commercial use?

FEC has unclear commercial terms, and Represent by Open North has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.