shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

FakerAPI vs What The Commit

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIFakerAPIDEAD0What The CommitHEALTHY79
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d1.0%99.02%
Uptime · 30d0.0%98.3%
P50 · ms8601312
P95 · ms8604279
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesno
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs What The Commit: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or What The Commit?

On our scheduled checks, What The Commit leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at 1.0% versus What The Commit at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, FakerAPI or What The Commit?

FakerAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — FakerAPI responds in 860 ms versus What The Commit at 1312 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do FakerAPI and What The Commit need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — FakerAPI is callable with no signup, and What The Commit is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call FakerAPI and What The Commit from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call FakerAPI and What The Commit from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are FakerAPI and What The Commit free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and What The Commit has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.