shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

FakerAPI vs US Autocomplete

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIFakerAPIDEAD0US AutocompleteREACHABLE99
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%99.44%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms—460
P95 · ms—1780
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree tier — API key required
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs US Autocomplete: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or US Autocomplete?

On our scheduled checks, US Autocomplete leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at 0.0% versus US Autocomplete at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do FakerAPI and US Autocomplete need an API key?

FakerAPI needs no key, while US Autocomplete requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for FakerAPI first.

Can I call FakerAPI and US Autocomplete from the browser?

Only US Autocomplete is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are FakerAPI and US Autocomplete free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and US Autocomplete has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.