FakerAPI vs Scrnify

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d1.0%100%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms860927
P95 · ms8601742
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree tier — API key required
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs Scrnify: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or Scrnify?

On our scheduled checks, Scrnify leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at 1.0% versus Scrnify at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, FakerAPI or Scrnify?

FakerAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — FakerAPI responds in 860 ms versus Scrnify at 927 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do FakerAPI and Scrnify need an API key?

FakerAPI needs no key, while Scrnify requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for FakerAPI first.

Can I call FakerAPI and Scrnify from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call FakerAPI and Scrnify from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are FakerAPI and Scrnify free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and Scrnify has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.