shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

FakerAPI vs ScreenshotOne.com

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIFakerAPIDEAD0ScreenshotOne.comHEALTHY97
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%98.9%
Uptime · 30d0.0%98.3%
P50 · ms—205
P95 · ms—724
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree tier — API key required
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs ScreenshotOne.com: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or ScreenshotOne.com?

On our scheduled checks, ScreenshotOne.com leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at 0.0% versus ScreenshotOne.com at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do FakerAPI and ScreenshotOne.com need an API key?

FakerAPI needs no key, while ScreenshotOne.com requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for FakerAPI first.

Can I call FakerAPI and ScreenshotOne.com from the browser?

Only ScreenshotOne.com is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are FakerAPI and ScreenshotOne.com free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and ScreenshotOne.com has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.