shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

FakerAPI vs RSQ API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIFakerAPIDEAD0RSQ APIHEALTHY93
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%100%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms—172
P95 · ms—4248
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesno
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs RSQ API: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or RSQ API?

On our scheduled checks, RSQ API leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at 0.0% versus RSQ API at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do FakerAPI and RSQ API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — FakerAPI is callable with no signup, and RSQ API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call FakerAPI and RSQ API from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call FakerAPI and RSQ API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are FakerAPI and RSQ API free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and RSQ API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.