FakerAPI vs RandomUser

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d1.0%100%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms860210
P95 · ms860774
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified (generated data; sample photos governed by UI Faces terms)
Free tierFree — no keyFree — no key or signup
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs RandomUser: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or RandomUser?

On our scheduled checks, RandomUser leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at 1.0% versus RandomUser at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, FakerAPI or RandomUser?

RandomUser has the lower median latency in our checks — FakerAPI responds in 860 ms versus RandomUser at 210 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do FakerAPI and RandomUser need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — FakerAPI is callable with no signup, and RandomUser is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call FakerAPI and RandomUser from the browser?

Only RandomUser is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are FakerAPI and RandomUser free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and RandomUser has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.