FakerAPI vs QR & Barcode

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%100%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms—511
P95 · ms—1231
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs QR & Barcode: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or QR & Barcode?

On our scheduled checks, QR & Barcode leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at 0.0% versus QR & Barcode at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do FakerAPI and QR & Barcode need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — FakerAPI is callable with no signup, and QR & Barcode is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call FakerAPI and QR & Barcode from the browser?

Only QR & Barcode is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are FakerAPI and QR & Barcode free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and QR & Barcode has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.