shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

FakerAPI vs Icanhazip

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIFakerAPINEW—IcanhazipNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs Icanhazip: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or Icanhazip?

On our scheduled checks, Icanhazip leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at —% versus Icanhazip at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do FakerAPI and Icanhazip need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — FakerAPI is callable with no signup, and Icanhazip is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call FakerAPI and Icanhazip from the browser?

Yes — both FakerAPI and Icanhazip send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are FakerAPI and Icanhazip free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.