shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

FakerAPI vs Httpbin

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIFakerAPIDEAD0HttpbinHEALTHY85
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%86.0%
Uptime · 30d0.0%98.3%
P50 · ms—351
P95 · ms—2285
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs Httpbin: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or Httpbin?

On our scheduled checks, Httpbin leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at 0.0% versus Httpbin at 86.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do FakerAPI and Httpbin need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — FakerAPI is callable with no signup, and Httpbin is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call FakerAPI and Httpbin from the browser?

Only Httpbin is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are FakerAPI and Httpbin free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and Httpbin has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.