shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

FakerAPI vs Genderize.io

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIFakerAPIDEAD0Genderize.ioHEALTHY68
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%49.4%
Uptime · 30d0.0%58.6%
P50 · ms—287
P95 · ms—1060
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyKeyless usage limited (x-rate-limit-limit: 25 observed); 2,500 names/mo with a free key
Rate limit60 req/window · 59 remainingKeyless cap 25 per x-rate-limit-limit header; remaining/reset exposed in response headers
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

FakerAPI vs Genderize.io: common questions

Which is more reliable, FakerAPI or Genderize.io?

On our scheduled checks, Genderize.io leads on measured uptime — FakerAPI at 0.0% versus Genderize.io at 49.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do FakerAPI and Genderize.io need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — FakerAPI is callable with no signup, and Genderize.io is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call FakerAPI and Genderize.io from the browser?

Only Genderize.io is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are FakerAPI and Genderize.io free for commercial use?

FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms, and Genderize.io has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.