shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Fake JSON API vs OOPSpam

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIFake JSON APIHEALTHY88OOPSpamHEALTHY98
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d98.3%100%
P50 · ms865217
P95 · ms2006360
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished1000 req/window · 999 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Fake JSON API vs OOPSpam: common questions

Which is more reliable, Fake JSON API or OOPSpam?

On our scheduled checks, OOPSpam leads on measured uptime — Fake JSON API at 99.02% versus OOPSpam at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Fake JSON API or OOPSpam?

OOPSpam has the lower median latency in our checks — Fake JSON API responds in 865 ms versus OOPSpam at 217 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Fake JSON API and OOPSpam need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Fake JSON API is callable with no signup, and OOPSpam is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Fake JSON API and OOPSpam from the browser?

Only Fake JSON API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. OOPSpam needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Fake JSON API and OOPSpam free for commercial use?

Fake JSON API has unclear commercial terms, and OOPSpam has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.