Excuser vs Random Useless Facts
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Excuser vs Random Useless Facts: common questions
Which is more reliable, Excuser or Random Useless Facts?
On our scheduled checks, Excuser leads on measured uptime — Excuser at 100% versus Random Useless Facts at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Excuser or Random Useless Facts?
Excuser has the lower median latency in our checks — Excuser responds in 303 ms versus Random Useless Facts at 861 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Excuser and Random Useless Facts need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Excuser is callable with no signup, and Random Useless Facts is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Excuser and Random Useless Facts from the browser?
Yes — both Excuser and Random Useless Facts send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Excuser and Random Useless Facts free for commercial use?
Excuser has unclear commercial terms, and Random Useless Facts has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.