shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Excuser vs PandaScore REST API for All Videogames

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIExcuserNEW—PandaScore REST API for All VideogamesNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Excuser vs PandaScore REST API for All Videogames: common questions

Which is more reliable, Excuser or PandaScore REST API for All Videogames?

On our scheduled checks, PandaScore REST API for All Videogames leads on measured uptime — Excuser at —% versus PandaScore REST API for All Videogames at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Excuser and PandaScore REST API for All Videogames need an API key?

Excuser needs no key, while PandaScore REST API for All Videogames requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Excuser first.

Can I call Excuser and PandaScore REST API for All Videogames from the browser?

Only Excuser is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. PandaScore REST API for All Videogames needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Excuser and PandaScore REST API for All Videogames free for commercial use?

Excuser has unclear commercial terms, and PandaScore REST API for All Videogames has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.