Exchangerate.dev vs Razorpay IFSC
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Exchangerate.dev vs Razorpay IFSC: common questions
Which is more reliable, Exchangerate.dev or Razorpay IFSC?
On our scheduled checks, Razorpay IFSC leads on measured uptime — Exchangerate.dev at 71.6% versus Razorpay IFSC at 98.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Exchangerate.dev or Razorpay IFSC?
Exchangerate.dev has the lower median latency in our checks — Exchangerate.dev responds in 336 ms versus Razorpay IFSC at 519 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Exchangerate.dev and Razorpay IFSC need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Exchangerate.dev is callable with no signup, and Razorpay IFSC is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Exchangerate.dev and Razorpay IFSC from the browser?
Yes — both Exchangerate.dev and Razorpay IFSC send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Exchangerate.dev and Razorpay IFSC free for commercial use?
Exchangerate.dev has unclear commercial terms, and Razorpay IFSC has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.