ES·pera API vs ICD-10 Codes

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d0.0%100%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms—631
P95 · ms—3898
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-09-212026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

ES·pera API vs ICD-10 Codes: common questions

Which is more reliable, ES·pera API or ICD-10 Codes?

On our scheduled checks, ICD-10 Codes leads on measured uptime — ES·pera API at 0.0% versus ICD-10 Codes at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do ES·pera API and ICD-10 Codes need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — ES·pera API is callable with no signup, and ICD-10 Codes is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call ES·pera API and ICD-10 Codes from the browser?

Only ICD-10 Codes is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ES·pera API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are ES·pera API and ICD-10 Codes free for commercial use?

ES·pera API has unclear commercial terms, and ICD-10 Codes has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.