Episodate vs Shoof Aflam

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms867539
P95 · ms17081312
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Episodate vs Shoof Aflam: common questions

Which is more reliable, Episodate or Shoof Aflam?

Both are neck-and-neck — Episodate and Shoof Aflam each measure 99.02% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Episodate or Shoof Aflam?

Shoof Aflam has the lower median latency in our checks — Episodate responds in 867 ms versus Shoof Aflam at 539 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Episodate and Shoof Aflam need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Episodate is callable with no signup, and Shoof Aflam is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Episodate and Shoof Aflam from the browser?

Only Episodate is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Shoof Aflam needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Episodate and Shoof Aflam free for commercial use?

Episodate has unclear commercial terms, and Shoof Aflam has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.