English Random Words vs FakerAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d74.5%1.0%
Uptime · 30d71.7%0.0%
P50 · ms592860
P95 · ms2126860
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key
Rate limit30 req/window · 6 remaining · resets 58560 req/window · 59 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

English Random Words vs FakerAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, English Random Words or FakerAPI?

On our scheduled checks, English Random Words leads on measured uptime — English Random Words at 74.5% versus FakerAPI at 1.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, English Random Words or FakerAPI?

English Random Words has the lower median latency in our checks — English Random Words responds in 592 ms versus FakerAPI at 860 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do English Random Words and FakerAPI need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — English Random Words is callable with no signup, and FakerAPI is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call English Random Words and FakerAPI from the browser?

Only English Random Words is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are English Random Words and FakerAPI free for commercial use?

English Random Words has unclear commercial terms, and FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.