eLife Sciences API vs ScreenshotOne.com

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms409340
P95 · ms1039843
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

eLife Sciences API vs ScreenshotOne.com: common questions

Which is more reliable, eLife Sciences API or ScreenshotOne.com?

On our scheduled checks, eLife Sciences API leads on measured uptime — eLife Sciences API at 100% versus ScreenshotOne.com at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, eLife Sciences API or ScreenshotOne.com?

ScreenshotOne.com has the lower median latency in our checks — eLife Sciences API responds in 409 ms versus ScreenshotOne.com at 340 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do eLife Sciences API and ScreenshotOne.com need an API key?

eLife Sciences API needs no key, while ScreenshotOne.com requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for eLife Sciences API first.

Can I call eLife Sciences API and ScreenshotOne.com from the browser?

Yes — both eLife Sciences API and ScreenshotOne.com send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are eLife Sciences API and ScreenshotOne.com free for commercial use?

eLife Sciences API has unclear commercial terms, and ScreenshotOne.com has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.