shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Eden vs Warnely

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIEdenREACHABLE100WarnelyDYING89
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%90.2%
Uptime · 30d100%83.3%
P50 · ms475334
P95 · ms9261375
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Eden vs Warnely: common questions

Which is more reliable, Eden or Warnely?

On our scheduled checks, Eden leads on measured uptime — Eden at 100% versus Warnely at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Eden or Warnely?

Warnely has the lower median latency in our checks — Eden responds in 475 ms versus Warnely at 334 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Eden and Warnely need an API key?

Warnely needs no key, while Eden requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Warnely first.

Can I call Eden and Warnely from the browser?

Only Eden is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Warnely needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Eden and Warnely free for commercial use?

Eden has unclear commercial terms, and Warnely has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.