Eden vs Sofiaplan

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms4751666
P95 · ms9263475
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Eden vs Sofiaplan: common questions

Which is more reliable, Eden or Sofiaplan?

Both are neck-and-neck — Eden and Sofiaplan each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Eden or Sofiaplan?

Eden has the lower median latency in our checks — Eden responds in 475 ms versus Sofiaplan at 1666 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Eden and Sofiaplan need an API key?

Sofiaplan needs no key, while Eden requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Sofiaplan first.

Can I call Eden and Sofiaplan from the browser?

Only Eden is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Sofiaplan needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Eden and Sofiaplan free for commercial use?

Eden has unclear commercial terms, and Sofiaplan has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.