DummyJSON vs Image to Link

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms32281
P95 · ms1113937
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 1783510243Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DummyJSON vs Image to Link: common questions

Which is more reliable, DummyJSON or Image to Link?

On our scheduled checks, Image to Link leads on measured uptime — DummyJSON at 99.02% versus Image to Link at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, DummyJSON or Image to Link?

DummyJSON has the lower median latency in our checks — DummyJSON responds in 32 ms versus Image to Link at 281 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DummyJSON and Image to Link need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — DummyJSON is callable with no signup, and Image to Link is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call DummyJSON and Image to Link from the browser?

Yes — both DummyJSON and Image to Link send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are DummyJSON and Image to Link free for commercial use?

DummyJSON has unclear commercial terms, and Image to Link has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.