Drupal.org vs Wikipedia REST

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.9%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms881121
P95 · ms1653961
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedCC BY-SA 4.0
Free tierFree — limits not publishedUnlimited within etiquette
Rate limitRetry-After: 0s200/sec global courtesy cap
In directory since2026-07-052026-05-09
operationalpartialdownno data

Drupal.org vs Wikipedia REST: common questions

Which is more reliable, Drupal.org or Wikipedia REST?

On our scheduled checks, Wikipedia REST leads on measured uptime — Drupal.org at 98.9% versus Wikipedia REST at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Drupal.org or Wikipedia REST?

Wikipedia REST has the lower median latency in our checks — Drupal.org responds in 881 ms versus Wikipedia REST at 121 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Drupal.org and Wikipedia REST need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Drupal.org is callable with no signup, and Wikipedia REST is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Drupal.org and Wikipedia REST from the browser?

Yes — both Drupal.org and Wikipedia REST send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Drupal.org and Wikipedia REST free for commercial use?

Drupal.org has unclear commercial terms, and Wikipedia REST allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.