DownStatus vs SiteIntel

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d60.8%100%
Uptime · 30d33.3%100%
P50 · ms5891005
P95 · ms12953849
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no API key (per docs)Free tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DownStatus vs SiteIntel: common questions

Which is more reliable, DownStatus or SiteIntel?

On our scheduled checks, SiteIntel leads on measured uptime — DownStatus at 60.8% versus SiteIntel at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, DownStatus or SiteIntel?

DownStatus has the lower median latency in our checks — DownStatus responds in 589 ms versus SiteIntel at 1005 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DownStatus and SiteIntel need an API key?

DownStatus needs no key, while SiteIntel requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for DownStatus first.

Can I call DownStatus and SiteIntel from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call DownStatus and SiteIntel from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are DownStatus and SiteIntel free for commercial use?

DownStatus has unclear commercial terms, and SiteIntel has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.