DownStatus vs Icanhazip

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d60.8%26.5%
Uptime · 30d33.3%0.0%
P50 · ms589328
P95 · ms1295959
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — no API key (per docs)Free — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DownStatus vs Icanhazip: common questions

Which is more reliable, DownStatus or Icanhazip?

On our scheduled checks, DownStatus leads on measured uptime — DownStatus at 60.8% versus Icanhazip at 26.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, DownStatus or Icanhazip?

Icanhazip has the lower median latency in our checks — DownStatus responds in 589 ms versus Icanhazip at 328 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DownStatus and Icanhazip need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — DownStatus is callable with no signup, and Icanhazip is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call DownStatus and Icanhazip from the browser?

Only Icanhazip is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. DownStatus needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are DownStatus and Icanhazip free for commercial use?

DownStatus has unclear commercial terms, and Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.