District of Columbia Open Data vs Neotimo DGFiP Mirror
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
District of Columbia Open Data vs Neotimo DGFiP Mirror: common questions
Which is more reliable, District of Columbia Open Data or Neotimo DGFiP Mirror?
Both are neck-and-neck — District of Columbia Open Data and Neotimo DGFiP Mirror each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, District of Columbia Open Data or Neotimo DGFiP Mirror?
Neotimo DGFiP Mirror has the lower median latency in our checks — District of Columbia Open Data responds in 852 ms versus Neotimo DGFiP Mirror at 524 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do District of Columbia Open Data and Neotimo DGFiP Mirror need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — District of Columbia Open Data is callable with no signup, and Neotimo DGFiP Mirror is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call District of Columbia Open Data and Neotimo DGFiP Mirror from the browser?
Yes — both District of Columbia Open Data and Neotimo DGFiP Mirror send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are District of Columbia Open Data and Neotimo DGFiP Mirror free for commercial use?
District of Columbia Open Data has unclear commercial terms, and Neotimo DGFiP Mirror has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.