shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Disify vs TwitterApi.IO

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIDisifyNEW—TwitterApi.IOREACHABLE—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Disify vs TwitterApi.IO: common questions

Which is more reliable, Disify or TwitterApi.IO?

On our scheduled checks, TwitterApi.IO leads on measured uptime — Disify at —% versus TwitterApi.IO at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Disify and TwitterApi.IO need an API key?

Disify needs no key, while TwitterApi.IO requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Disify first.

Can I call Disify and TwitterApi.IO from the browser?

Only Disify is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. TwitterApi.IO needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Disify and TwitterApi.IO free for commercial use?

Disify has unclear commercial terms, and TwitterApi.IO has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.