Disify vs Remotive

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d42.2%100%
Uptime · 30d28.3%100%
P50 · ms1075612
P95 · ms16792572
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit30 req/window · 21 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Disify vs Remotive: common questions

Which is more reliable, Disify or Remotive?

On our scheduled checks, Remotive leads on measured uptime — Disify at 42.2% versus Remotive at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Disify or Remotive?

Remotive has the lower median latency in our checks — Disify responds in 1075 ms versus Remotive at 612 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Disify and Remotive need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Disify is callable with no signup, and Remotive is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Disify and Remotive from the browser?

Only Remotive is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Disify needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Disify and Remotive free for commercial use?

Disify has unclear commercial terms, and Remotive has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.