Disify vs Magic 8-Ball API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d42.2%100%
Uptime · 30d28.3%100%
P50 · ms1075442
P95 · ms16791134
Authnonenone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit30 req/window · 21 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Disify vs Magic 8-Ball API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Disify or Magic 8-Ball API?

On our scheduled checks, Magic 8-Ball API leads on measured uptime — Disify at 42.2% versus Magic 8-Ball API at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Disify or Magic 8-Ball API?

Magic 8-Ball API has the lower median latency in our checks — Disify responds in 1075 ms versus Magic 8-Ball API at 442 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Disify and Magic 8-Ball API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Disify is callable with no signup, and Magic 8-Ball API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Disify and Magic 8-Ball API from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Disify and Magic 8-Ball API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Disify and Magic 8-Ball API free for commercial use?

Disify has unclear commercial terms, and Magic 8-Ball API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.