Disify vs HackerNews

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d42.2%100%
Uptime · 30d28.3%100%
P50 · ms1075380
P95 · ms16791269
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key required
Rate limit30 req/window · 21 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Disify vs HackerNews: common questions

Which is more reliable, Disify or HackerNews?

On our scheduled checks, HackerNews leads on measured uptime — Disify at 42.2% versus HackerNews at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Disify or HackerNews?

HackerNews has the lower median latency in our checks — Disify responds in 1075 ms versus HackerNews at 380 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Disify and HackerNews need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Disify is callable with no signup, and HackerNews is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Disify and HackerNews from the browser?

Only HackerNews is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Disify needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Disify and HackerNews free for commercial use?

Disify has unclear commercial terms, and HackerNews has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.