Disify vs Grass Touch API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Disify vs Grass Touch API: common questions
Which is more reliable, Disify or Grass Touch API?
On our scheduled checks, Disify leads on measured uptime — Disify at 42.2% versus Grass Touch API at 2.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Disify or Grass Touch API?
Disify has the lower median latency in our checks — Disify responds in 1075 ms versus Grass Touch API at 1701 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Disify and Grass Touch API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Disify is callable with no signup, and Grass Touch API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Disify and Grass Touch API from the browser?
Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Disify and Grass Touch API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.
Are Disify and Grass Touch API free for commercial use?
Disify has unclear commercial terms, and Grass Touch API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.