Disify vs Fedora Messaging API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d42.2%97.1%
Uptime · 30d28.3%98.3%
P50 · ms10751510
P95 · ms16794975
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limit30 req/window · 21 remainingUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Disify vs Fedora Messaging API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Disify or Fedora Messaging API?

On our scheduled checks, Fedora Messaging API leads on measured uptime — Disify at 42.2% versus Fedora Messaging API at 97.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Disify or Fedora Messaging API?

Disify has the lower median latency in our checks — Disify responds in 1075 ms versus Fedora Messaging API at 1510 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Disify and Fedora Messaging API need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Disify is callable with no signup, and Fedora Messaging API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Disify and Fedora Messaging API from the browser?

Only Fedora Messaging API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Disify needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Disify and Fedora Messaging API free for commercial use?

Disify has unclear commercial terms, and Fedora Messaging API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.