shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Discogs vs MusicBrainz

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIDiscogsDEAD0MusicBrainzHEALTHY82
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d8.8%90.2%
Uptime · 30d0.0%86.7%
P50 · ms329660
P95 · ms4594770
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseUnverifiedCore data CC0; some supplementary data CC BY-NC-SA 3.0
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublished~1 request/second per IP; descriptive User-Agent required
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Discogs vs MusicBrainz: common questions

Which is more reliable, Discogs or MusicBrainz?

On our scheduled checks, MusicBrainz leads on measured uptime — Discogs at 8.8% versus MusicBrainz at 90.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Discogs or MusicBrainz?

Discogs has the lower median latency in our checks — Discogs responds in 329 ms versus MusicBrainz at 660 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Discogs and MusicBrainz need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Discogs is callable with no signup, and MusicBrainz is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Discogs and MusicBrainz from the browser?

Only MusicBrainz is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Discogs needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Discogs and MusicBrainz free for commercial use?

Discogs has unclear commercial terms, and MusicBrainz allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.