shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

DiscGolf vs WhiskyHunter

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIDiscGolfNEW—WhiskyHunterNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseFree to use with attribution (per response metadata)Unverified
Free tierFree — public endpoints, no keyFree — no API key
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DiscGolf vs WhiskyHunter: common questions

Which is more reliable, DiscGolf or WhiskyHunter?

On our scheduled checks, WhiskyHunter leads on measured uptime — DiscGolf at —% versus WhiskyHunter at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do DiscGolf and WhiskyHunter need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — DiscGolf is callable with no signup, and WhiskyHunter is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call DiscGolf and WhiskyHunter from the browser?

Only DiscGolf is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. WhiskyHunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are DiscGolf and WhiskyHunter free for commercial use?

DiscGolf has unclear commercial terms, and WhiskyHunter has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.