DiscGolf vs Padel Snipe

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%82.4%
Uptime · 30d100%80.0%
P50 · ms7623830
P95 · ms21534941
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearyes
Data licenseFree to use with attribution (per response metadata)CC-BY 4.0
Free tierFree — public endpoints, no keyFree — no auth
Rate limitUnpublishedFair use — no hard limit stated
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DiscGolf vs Padel Snipe: common questions

Which is more reliable, DiscGolf or Padel Snipe?

On our scheduled checks, DiscGolf leads on measured uptime — DiscGolf at 100% versus Padel Snipe at 82.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, DiscGolf or Padel Snipe?

DiscGolf has the lower median latency in our checks — DiscGolf responds in 762 ms versus Padel Snipe at 3830 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DiscGolf and Padel Snipe need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — DiscGolf is callable with no signup, and Padel Snipe is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call DiscGolf and Padel Snipe from the browser?

Yes — both DiscGolf and Padel Snipe send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are DiscGolf and Padel Snipe free for commercial use?

DiscGolf has unclear commercial terms, and Padel Snipe allows commercial use on its free tier. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.