DiscGolf vs ICD-10 Codes

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms7621831
P95 · ms21533898
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseFree to use with attribution (per response metadata)Unverified
Free tierFree — public endpoints, no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

DiscGolf vs ICD-10 Codes: common questions

Which is more reliable, DiscGolf or ICD-10 Codes?

Both are neck-and-neck — DiscGolf and ICD-10 Codes each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, DiscGolf or ICD-10 Codes?

DiscGolf has the lower median latency in our checks — DiscGolf responds in 762 ms versus ICD-10 Codes at 1831 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do DiscGolf and ICD-10 Codes need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — DiscGolf is callable with no signup, and ICD-10 Codes is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call DiscGolf and ICD-10 Codes from the browser?

Yes — both DiscGolf and ICD-10 Codes send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are DiscGolf and ICD-10 Codes free for commercial use?

DiscGolf has unclear commercial terms, and ICD-10 Codes has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.